New York State Medical Treatment Guidelines for Eye disorders in workers compensation patients

The overarching principles outlined by the New York State Workers Compensation Board provide general guidelines for managing eye disorders. These directives aim to assist healthcare professionals in determining appropriate strategies for diagnosing and addressing various conditions affecting the eyes as part of a comprehensive care plan.

Healthcare practitioners specializing in eye disorders can rely on the guidance from the Workers Compensation Board to make well-informed decisions about the most suitable approaches for assessing and treating eye-related conditions in their patients.

It is crucial to emphasize that these guidelines are not intended to replace clinical judgment or professional expertise. The ultimate decision regarding the management of eye disorders should involve collaboration between the patient and their healthcare provider.


General Guiding Principles

Making sure these principles are front and center is key for applying the New York State Medical Treatment Guidelines (MTG), and they’re important for anyone dealing with Workers’ Compensation Medical Treatment Guidelines.

A.1 Focus on Medical Care

When it comes to treating a work-related injury, the focus should be on getting the person back to their usual daily routine and work activities. We’re aiming for a return to both regular health and work as much as possible.

A.2 Utilization of Medical Services

Any medical provider taking care of a workers’ compensation patient needs to stick to the Treatment Guidelines laid out for all work-related injuries or illnesses.

A.3 Recognition of Positive Patient Response

Success means clear, measurable improvements in how well a person functions. This covers things like their range of motion, strength, ability to handle daily activities, and even mental well-being. We’re not just looking at what they say about pain; we’re also considering how it lines up with the injury.

A.4 Reassessing Treatment

If a specific treatment plan isn’t showing positive results within a set timeframe, the provider should think about tweaking or stopping it. We’re talking about checking how things are going 2 to 3 weeks after the first visit and then every 3 to 4 weeks after that. Mental health situations might need a bit more time, and other non-musculoskeletal issues might need quicker check-ins. And hey, if a treatment isn’t working as expected, it’s cool to double-check the diagnosis—it could be the key to figuring out what’s going wrong.

A.5 Emphasis on Education

Let’s talk about education—making sure everyone in the picture, from the patient to the family, employer, insurer, policymakers, and the community, is in the know about work-related injuries or illnesses. It’s not just about throwing information at them; it’s about effective communication that puts the patient at ease. When we’re crafting a treatment plan, it’s essential to include educating individuals or groups so they can manage symptoms on their own and dodge future injuries.

A.6 Severity Classification and Timeframes

We’re breaking down the seriousness of injuries into three stages: Acute (less than one month), Subacute (one to three months), and Chronic (over three months). It helps us understand where someone is at in the journey of dealing with a health issue.

A.7 Clarity on Initial Evaluation

“Initial Evaluation” is all about the acute phase right after an injury—it’s not about the first time a doctor checks out a worker in an office. We’re talking about that crucial period following an injury.

A.8 Diagnostic Time Frames

When we talk about starting diagnostic tests, we’re clocking it from the date of the injury. But hey, sometimes the situation might call for speeding things up or giving it a bit more time, depending on what makes sense clinically.

A.9 Treatment Time Frames

Treatment kicks off when, well, treatments begin, not from the date of the injury. We get it—how long you treat someone depends on the disease, how severe it is, if the patient is keeping up, and what services are available. Sometimes, the plan might need a tweak based on the clinical situation.

A1.0 Extended Recovery Period

If things aren’t progressing as expected within 6-12 weeks after an injury, and what the patient feels doesn’t quite match up with what we’re seeing in tests, it’s time to double-check the diagnosis. Reevaluate the treatment plan too. For issues not inherently tied to mental health, keep an eye out for anything that might be holding back recovery (those yellow flags or psychological issues). At that 6-12 week mark, think about alternative treatment plans, including formal evaluations from mental health experts.

Stay alert to any mental health stuff that was there before or popped up during recovery. If the problem is clear from the get-go (like a work-related mental health issue in the claim), it’s totally okay to bring in a mental health provider much sooner. Remember, sending someone to a mental health provider doesn’t automatically mean there’s a psychiatric or psychological condition. Evaluating and managing a delayed recovery doesn’t automatically stamp a claim with a psychiatric or psychological label.


A.11 Promotion of Active Interventions

Let’s talk about getting you involved in your treatment. We’re all about active interventions, like exercises and hands-on treatments, putting you in the driver’s seat as your treatment progresses. Passive stuff, like treatments that are done to you, is seen as supportive tools to help you along in an active rehabilitation plan, making sure we’re hitting those goals of getting you moving better.

A.12 Goals of Active Therapeutic Exercise Program

In our exercise program, the goals are all about making you stronger, building endurance, boosting flexibility, and improving things like your range of motion, sensory skills, coordination, and even your thinking and behavior if that’s in the mix. It’s not just about the exercises; it’s about integrating them into real-life situations, whether it’s at work or in the community.

A.13 Utilization of Diagnostic Imaging and Testing Procedures

Okay, let’s talk about getting a closer look when we need to. Before we jump into any imaging or tests, we’re basing our decisions on what we find out from your history and a good once-over. Each diagnostic procedure has its strengths and weaknesses for different diagnoses. Choosing one over another depends on things like how well it diagnoses, the risks involved, the tech available, your comfort, and how familiar your provider is with the procedure.

Diagnostic Procedures and Repetition

We don’t like unnecessary repeats, but sometimes, a second round might be needed. If the first go-around didn’t give us the quality info we need, a second diagnostic procedure is fair game. We’re cautious about doing this too much, especially with things like x-rays and CT scans because, let’s face it, too much radiation isn’t great.

Now, if your situation or treatment calls for it, we might repeat some tests along the way. This could be to check how things are progressing, stage the issue, or get a handle on symptoms. It’s important to know that while these tests help, they also add up the radiation dose and risks. So, we’re mindful about how often we do this.

Smart Selection of Diagnostic Procedures

We’re not throwing everything at you. We’re being smart about picking the right procedure for the job, whether it’s a one-time thing, part of a bigger plan, or in a certain order with other tests. It’s all about getting the most accurate info, keeping you safe, and not wasting time or resources on unnecessary repeats.


A.14 Surgical Interventions

Let’s chat about surgery—it’s not a magic fix. We should always be thinking about what kind of function we’re expecting post-surgery because relying solely on surgery for a complete cure is often a bit misleading. Before we even consider going under the knife, we need a solid connection between what we see in the clinic, how things are going clinically, and what shows up on imaging and other tests. All of these pieces should point us to a specific diagnosis, pinpointing the real issues. When it comes to treating pain with surgery, there has to be a clear link between the pain and some concrete evidence of what’s causing it. Oh, and making decisions about surgery? Definitely a team effort with the patient. They need to understand the pros and cons, consider rehab as an alternative if it makes sense, know about outcomes backed by evidence, and get a good grasp of what the whole surgical journey involves.

A.15 Pre-Authorization

When it comes to green-lighting stuff like diagnostic tests, therapies, or surgeries, we’re all for it—except for those specific procedures listed in the rules. If a provider wants to dive into one of those, they’ve got to check in with the carrier first. Same goes for any repeat performances or second takes on a surgical procedure—if the guidelines don’t cover multiple rounds, a quick chat with the carrier is a must before getting started. Let’s keep things legit.

A.16 Psychological/Psychiatric Evaluations

Let’s dive into the mental health side of things because, for some folks, mental health evaluations are key to figuring out, confirming, or locking in a diagnosis. Now, the nitty-gritty of these evaluations and how long they go on for depends on what we’re dealing with. Is the mental health issue at the heart of the claim, or is it playing second fiddle to a physical injury? Maybe there’s a mental health problem that’s got nothing to do with the work injury but is making recovery a bit trickier.

When we’re testing psychological functions or doing psychometric tests, they can be super helpful in uncovering related issues, but here’s the deal: these tests alone can’t hand out a diagnosis. It’s only when we’ve gone through all the info—history, interviews, the whole shebang—that we can pin down a diagnosis.

Now, we’re big on clear communication. If the patient is more comfortable in their primary language, we’re all for it. But hey, if we don’t have someone who speaks their language, we’re making sure a professional interpreter steps in.

Frequency Guidelines:

  1. Pre-existing Mental Health Issues: If we’re dealing with an existing mental health problem that’s been stirred up or is slowing down recovery from a work-related injury, one visit for the first chat with the mental health pro should do the trick. Any follow-up care would usually stick with the provider who’s been on the case.
  2. Psychometric Testing: If we’re getting into testing during the first meeting, we’re capping it at an extra three hours of the pro’s time.
  3. Central Mental Health Issue in the Claim: Now, if the mental health side is front and center in the claim from the get-go or pops up as a result of the work injury, we might need more in-depth diagnostics and therapies. We’ve got a whole set of guidelines for these mental health scenarios laid out in the Medical Treatment Guidelines. It’s like our playbook for tackling these situations the right way.
  4. A.17 Personality/Psychological/Psychosocial InterventionSo, we’ve got this psychosocial evaluation that’s shouting “Intervention needed!” When that happens, it’s key to kick off the intervention game pronto. This can either fly solo or team up with other treatments—it’s versatile like that. But here’s the deal with any psychological or psychiatric help: we need a solid plan. Think measurable goals, specific actions, and timelines.General Time Frames for Intervention:
    • Time to show some effect: Give it two to eight weeks.
    • Best duration: Keep it rolling for six weeks to three months.
    • Top-end duration: Cap it at three to six months. And quick note: counseling is all about boosting recovery, not throwing in delays.

    Now, if we’re talking PTSD, it’s a bit different:

    • Ideal run: Three to six months.
    • Maximum stretch: Aim for nine to twelve months. For some folks, a bit of extra TLC might be needed. If that’s the case, the treating pro should drop some documentation every four weeks for the first six months, projecting how things are shaping up and giving the lowdown on the psychological scene. If the treatment pushes on for six to twelve months, check-ins happen every four to eight weeks. And if we’re talking beyond the twelve-month mark, updates roll in every eight to twelve weeks. Keeping everyone in the loop is key for a smooth treatment ride.

    A.18 Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE)

    Now, let’s talk Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). It’s this thorough checkup—could be a deep dive or a bit more focused—looking at everything to do with a person’s ability to get back to the work hustle.

    This check covers endurance, lifting (both heavy and not-so-heavy), how long someone can hold certain positions, specific range-of-motion skills, coordination and strength, work habits, job potential, and even the psychosocial, cognitive, and sensory bits linked to work. It’s got a bit of everything—muscles, heart health, coordination, the works.

    Now, not everyone needs an FCE to figure out if they’re work-ready. It usually comes into play at Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI), especially if attempts to return to the grind have hit some bumps. But here’s the thing: it’s not an early-game move, and it’s not the only card in the deck for making diagnoses, especially when it comes to sniffing out someone trying to play hooky from work. The treating physician, who knows the job ropes, should decode the FCE in the context of the patient’s whole deal—medical history, how they’re feeling, the whole shebang. Let’s keep it real: FCEs aren’t the sole judge of whether someone’s faking it or not.

A.19 Return To Work

Let’s dive into the work comeback. In these guidelines, “return to work” means jumping into any work or task the patient can handle safely, even if it’s a bit different from their usual gig. Figuring out when it’s time to head back to the grind is a big part of medical care and should be woven into the treatment plan. At each outpatient visit, we’re talking about giving the lowdown on the patient’s status and any limits on tasks, forming the backbone of the treatment plan. The goal? Getting folks back to work sooner rather than later. These guidelines push for moving patients along the care and return-to-work path, knowing that the longer someone stays out of work, the trickier it gets to ease them back in.

A.20 Job Site Evaluation

Now, about checking out where the work magic happens. The treating physician can have a heart-to-heart with the employer, whether in person, over video, or on the phone, to get the scoop on what the patient’s job looked like before the injury. We’re talking about the nitty-gritty—the physical demands like lifting, repetitive moves, postures that need a bit of finesse, the work environment, stress levels, and anything else that could be a speed bump to a smooth return or put the recovery on shaky ground.

If going back to the old job scene is a no-go because of restrictions from the doc, it’s time to dig into options for modified duties that match up with what the patient can handle. And hey, more than one evaluation might be on the cards in certain situations.

Sure, it would be awesome to check out the job site in person, but let’s be real, that’s not always doable. When employers have videos or the like showing the job scene, that’s gold. Video calls from the worksite, ideally from the actual workstation, can also spill some useful beans.

Frequency of Contacts:

  • First chat: When the patient is good to tackle some work.
  • Round two: When the patient has leveled up and is ready for a bit more action on the job front. And here’s a note: every detail of these talks should be penned down by the physician.
Skip to content